|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Writing a Critical Film ReviewPrintable version here. 1st- Check Out a Few Sample Reviews by Roger Ebert Now, a good film critique provides the reader with a basic idea of what the film is about. It provides the writer’s critical assessment of the success/failure or effectiveness/ineffectiveness of the film supported by the evidence the writer gathers from the film. It is more than a plot synopsis or the enthusiastic blurbs of publicity hype. For the writer, the critique is an opportunity to exhibit a critical awareness of the elements of the film as well as to share the delight and pleasure (or frustration and disappointment) the film offers the viewer. The questions below are meant to stimulate thought about a film and to provide areas of concern you may wish to address in your critique. The list is by no means exhaustive. Early in the critique it is desirable to sketch enough of the plot to give the reader an idea of what happens in the film. Do not try to recount everything—the key word here is sketch. If you provide only a plot summary, you are not writing a critique—you’re writing the equivalent of a book report. Once you introduce the main characters and devote a few lines to the plot, thus giving the reader a good overview, get down to the job of convincing the reader that you have something interesting to say about the film—the plot is trivial, the hero is not really a hero, the plot and characters are fine but the camera work is needlessly tricky, or whatever else you decide your thesis to be. Always use the present tense when writing your review and avoid words such as “great’’, “excellent” and the all-encompassing “really good”. Questions to take notes on as you watch the film- 1) Is the film adapted from fiction or drama, or is it based on an original idea and screenplay? If it is an adaptation, does it follow the original and neglect the cinematic opportunities of the story? Or does it sacrifice the original work for unnecessary cinematic devices? If the story is original, how fresh or innovative is it? 2) Are the characters believable? 3) Are the actors appropriately cast? 4) What is the theme (main idea) of the film? Do the plot, acting, and other elements in the film successfully impart the theme to the viewer? 5) Is the setting/locale appropriate and effective? 6) Is the cinematography effective? Does the film make certain use of color, texture, lighting, etc. to enhance the theme, mood, setting? 7) Is the sound track effective? Is the music appropriate and functional, or is it inappropriate and obtrusive? 8) Are camera angles used effectively? Are they ever used for a particular effect? 9) Are there special effects (and/or special effects makeup) in the film? If so, are they essential to the plot? Are they handled skillfully? Do they serve a necessary function, or does the film sacrifice plot or characterization for the effects themselves? 10) Does the film make use of symbols or symbolism? What purpose do the symbols serve? Are they used effectively? How does the symbolism in the film contribute to or enhance the film’s overall theme? Assignment: Write a 2 page critique discussing the strengths or weaknesses of the film viewed in class. Remember to use specific examples from the film to support your opinions. Make sure to discuss the movie’s: 1, Themes 2. Character and 3.Production qualities such as cinematography, production design, special effects etc. This is to be written as an analytical essay with a minimum of five paragraphs. The Typical Structure Looks Like: 1. Title – catchy, can indicate if review will be positive or negative, you can play with words to make it funny or different
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||